Computing by physical interaction in neurons
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrodynamics of action potentials represents the fundamental level where information is integrated and processed in neurons. The Hodgkin-Huxley model cannot explain the non-stereotyped spatial charge density dynamics that occur during action potential propagation. Revealed in experiments as spike directivity, the non-uniform charge density dynamics within neurons carry meaningful information and suggest that fragments of information regarding our memories are endogenously stored in structural patterns at a molecular level and are revealed only during spiking activity. The main conceptual idea is that under the influence of electric fields, efficient computation by interaction occurs between charge densities embedded within molecular structures and the transient developed flow of electrical charges. This process of computation underlying electrical interactions and molecular mechanisms at the subcellular level is dissimilar from spiking neuron models that are completely devoid of physical interactions. Computation by interaction describes a more powerful continuous model of computation than the one that consists of discrete steps as represented in Turing machines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it