Retinoic acid suppression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in porcine oocyte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presence of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) has been found in porcine oocytes, but its mRNA and protein levels remain relatively constant during hormonal stimulation. The present study was designed to determine the effect of retinoic acid on eNOS regulation in porcine oocytes during follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulation. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs), prepared from small antral follicles of immature porcine ovaries, were cultured for 15 h and treated with FSH for an additional 48 h. eNOS mRNA and its protein were analyzed by reverse transcription - polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting, respectively. Retinoic acid had an inhibitory effect on the level of oocyte eNOS mRNA in a dose-dependent manner if COCs were exposed to retinoic acid before FSH stimulation. The inhibition of FSH action was reflected in a decrease in expression of c-fos mRNA. eNOS protein also decreased to approximately 50% of the control after exposure to 10 microM retinoic acid. However, the ability of NO synthesis was abolished in the oocytes prepared from retinoic acid pretreated COCs. These results suggest that retinoic acid has a strong inhibitory action on eNOS mRNA level and NO synthesis in the porcine oocyte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".