Endotoxemia in Transgenic Mice Overexpressing Human Glutathione Peroxidases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to endotoxemia induced by administration of lipopolysaccharide, a complex series of reactions occurs in mammalian tissues. During this inflammation response, cells produce different mediators, such as reactive oxygen species, a number of arachidonic acid metabolites, and cytokines. The reactive oxygen species thus generated have been suggested to produce tissue injury as a result of macromolecular damage or by interfering with regulatory processes. They may also act as important signaling molecules to induce redox-sensitive genes. We report here that transgenic mice overexpressing 2 major forms of human glutathione peroxidases (GPs), intra- and extracellular GP, are able to modulate host response during endotoxemic conditions. We show that these animals have a decreased hypotension and increased survival rate after administration of a high dosage of lipopolysaccharide. Overexpression of GPs alters vascular permeability and production of cytokines (interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) and NO, affects arachidonic acid metabolism, and inhibits leukocyte migration. These results suggest an important role for peroxides in pathogenesis during endotoxemia, and GPs, by regulating their level, may prove to be good candidates for antioxidant therapy to protect against such injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".