Anticipation of age at onset in familial multiple sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Anticipation of age at onset in the younger generations is a widely known characteristic of many diseases with genetic inheritance. This study was performed to assess whether there is anticipation of age at onset in younger generations of familial multiple sclerosis (MS) in a Spanish population and to compare clinical characteristics of familial and sporadic MS. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 1110 patients diagnosed with MS and followed-up in our MS Unit. Patients were considered as familial MS if they had in their family at least one relative of first or second degree diagnosed with MS. Otherwise, patients were considered to have sporadic MS. We compared the age at onset between relatives from different generations, and we also compared the age at onset of familial and sporadic MS. RESULTS: A lower age at onset in the younger generations was found (median 22 years vs. 30 years, P < 0.001) and a significant lower age at onset of the disease in familial MS comparing to sporadic MS (median 25 years vs. 29 years, P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: There is an anticipation of the age at onset of MS in the younger generations of patients with familial MS. There is also a lower age at onset in familial versus sporadic MS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".