MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127521068 · doi:10.5539/ep.v1n2p97

Degradation of Anthracene by Alkaliphilic Bacteria Bacillus badius

2012· article· en· W2127521068 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment and Pollution · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnthraceneStrain (injury)Degradation (telecommunications)ChemistryBacterial strainBacteriaMicrobial biodegradationBiodegradationNuclear chemistryEnvironmental chemistryFood scienceOrganic chemistryBiologyMicroorganism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alkaliphilic bacterial strain Bacillus badius D1was isolated from Pristine Crater Lake of Lonar, Buldhana, MS, India. It was found that the bacterial strain had a promising potential to degrade aromatic hydrocarbons. The growth conditions of the strain were optimized. The bacterial strain Bacillus badius D1 could degrade anthracene at a concentration of 50 mg/100 ml at pH 9.0 with in 60 hrs. Similarly the effect of experimental parameters like pH, temperature, and salinity was also studied on anthracene degradation. The structural determination of the intermediates of anthracene degradation was carried out by spectroscopic analysis like FTIR, GC-MS and 1HNMR. A tentative pathway of anthracene degradation by bacillus badius D1 is also reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it