MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127543586 · doi:10.4039/n07-027

Mycobatidae (Acari: Oribatida) of North America

2008· article· en· W2127543586 on OpenAlexaffabout
Valerie M. Behan‐Pelletier, Barbara Eamer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Entomologist · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicStudy of Mite Species
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOribatidaAcariLittoral zoneGenusSynonym (taxonomy)HabitatEcologyMiteGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The oribatid mite family Mycobatidae is represented in America north of Mexico by the eight genera,CyrtozetesBehan-Pelletier, CeresellaPavlitshenko, GuatemalozetesMahunka, MinunthozetesHull, MycobatesHull, PelopsisHall, PunctoribatesBerlese, andZachvatkinibatesShaldybina. Species occur in forests, grasslands, and arctic soils, in canopy habitats, and in the marine and freshwater littoral zone. Three new mycobatid species from North America are described:Ceresella reevesisp. nov.from forest habitats of western North America,Cyrtozetes lindoaesp. nov.from canopy habitats of western Canada, andPunctoribates weigmannisp. nov.from forest litter in eastern North America. The descriptions ofPelopsis bifurcatus(Ewing) andPunctoribates punctum(C.L. Koch) are expanded based on specimens from North America.Punctoribates palustris(Banks) is redescribed based on specimens from throughout North America.Punctoribates armipes(Banks) is considered a junior subjective synonym ofP. palustris(Banks). New distribution records are given forGuatemalozetes danosBehan-Pelletier and Ryabinin andMinunthozetes semirufus(Koch). Diagnoses are given for each genus discussed, and keys are provided to the eight genera of Mycobatidae of North America and to species ofCyrtozetesandPunctoribates, genera not recently revised.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian EntomologistSame topicStudy of Mite SpeciesFrench-language works237,207