MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127550738 · doi:10.1109/ppc.2011.6191626

Klystron modulator technology challenges for the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC)

2011· article· en· W2127550738 on OpenAlex
Davide Aguglia, Carlos Augusto Paiva da Silva Martins, Miguel Cerqueira Bastos, D. Nisbet, Daniel Siemaszko, E. Sklavounou, P. Viarouge

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKlystronColliderConvertersLinear particle acceleratorElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringPower (physics)PhysicsReliability (semiconductor)VoltageComputer scienceEngineeringNuclear physicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the research and development challenges foreseen for the klystron modulators design for a new accelerator complex, the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC). This huge electron-positron accelerator needs roughly 300MW of average power for feeding the 1638 required klystron modulators. The main challenges for designing theses new pulsed klystron modulators are described. Considering the state of the art in several domain such as converters topologies, voltage measurements precision, pulse-to-pulse reproducibility, AC power quality issues, efficiency maximization, accelerator reliability & availability, this paper illustrates the most challenging future developments directions and the need for an international and coordinated R&D program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics ResearchFrench-language works237,207