MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Political Economy of the Preferential Trade Liberalizations and Regionalism in South Asia: Opportunities and Challenges

2010· article· en· W2127558537 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ershad Ali, Dayal Talukder

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegionalism (politics)RealisationPolitical scienceLiberalizationPoliticsEconomyRegional tradeFree tradeHumanitiesInternational tradeEconomicsDemocracy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Like other parts of the globe, south Asia has also been liberalizing the trade terms and conditions among its neibouring countries since last decades. However, the achievement is still limited although the agreements have been signed with was a high hope. This paper examines the opportunities and challenges of the preferential trade liberalization and regionalism in South Asia under political economy perspective. The study has reviewed secondary data and found that political environment is one of the main reasons of not achieving the desired goal of the agreements. Lack of trusts and absence of friendly environment among the member countries of the region has been working as a barrier for not achieving benefit of the agreement. The paper might be useful for policy makers, researchers and academics. Keywords: Regionalism; Preferential Trade Agreement; South Asia; Political Economy; Economic Development Resume: Comme d'autres parties du monde, l'Asie du Sud est egalement en train de liberaliser des termes et des conditions de commerce dans ses pays voisins depuis ces dernieres decennies. Toutefois, la realisation est encore limitee meme si les accords ont ete signes avec un grand espoir. Ce document examine les opportunites et les defis de la liberalisation de commerce preferentielle et le regionalisme en Asie du Sud en vertu de perspective d'economie politique. L'etude a examine les donnees secondaires et a constate que l'environnement politique etait l'une des raisons principales de non atteinte du but recherche de ces accords. Le manque de confiance et l'absence d'un environnement amicale entre les pays membres de la region ont ete considerees comme une barriere qui les empechent d'atteindre des avantages de l'accord. Le document pourrait etre utile pour les decideurs politiques, les chercheurs et les universitaires.Mots-cles: regionalism; accord commercial preferential; Asie du Sud; economie politique; developpement economique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.087 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207