MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127559111 · doi:10.1177/104063870101300216

Rare Detection of <i>Neospora Caninum</i> in Placentas from Seropositive Dams Giving Birth to Full-Term Calves

2001· article· en· W2127559111 on OpenAlexaff
Nadia Bergeron, Christiane Girard, Julie Paré, Gilles Fecteau, John J. Robinson, Paul Baillargeon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Canadian institutionsAbbott (Canada)Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeospora caninumBiologyNeosporaImmunohistochemistryIncidence (geometry)FetusPregnancyAndrologyVirologyMedicineAntibodyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neospora caninum is thought to be transmitted to cattle by dogs, the only known definitive host. Although aborted fetuses seem the most likely source of infective material for dogs, placentas from seropositive dams appear also as a potential source of infective material. The objective of the study was to evaluate the presence of N. caninum organisms in placentas of full-term calves born to seropositive cows. Sixteen placentas, 11 from Neospora-seropositive cows, were examined histologically and by immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the presence of N. caninum. Mild placentitis was observed in all placentas. Neospora caninum was not identified by immunohistochemistry, but placentas from 2 seropositive dams were positive for N. caninum by PCR. These results suggest that placentas of full-term calves from seropositive cows may be a potential source of N. caninum for dogs, but the incidence of this mode of transmission is likely to be low.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic InvestigationSame topicToxoplasma gondii Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207