Ultrasonic properties of glassy alloys in terms of complex wave elasticity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Using ultrasonics, acoustic characteristics of Pd40Cu30P20, Zr55Cu30Al10Ni5, Zr65Pd12.5Ni10Al7.5Cu5, Cu55Zr30Ti10Pd5, Cu45Zr20Hf25Ag10 and Ti41.5Cu42.5Ni7.5Hf5Zr2.5Sn1 glassy alloys were examined in terms of complex elasticity. The order of bulk modulus (K), Lamé parameter (λ), Young (E) and shear (G) moduli of the glassy alloys shows the monopolistical character of the glassy alloys, except for polymers and rubbers. Poison's ratio correlates well to the anisotropy factor and the ratio G /K, accompanied by dilational and shear attenuation coefficients, showing characteristic one‐dimensional elastic deformability of the glassy alloys. The complex elasticity shows that the viscoelasticity of the glassy alloys is predominated by volumetric motion, associated with the complex waves. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".