MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127586953 · doi:10.1109/lmwc.2006.872128

A 4-mW monolithic CMOS LNA at 5.7GHz with the gate resistance used for input matching

2006· article· en· W2127586953 on OpenAlexaff
S. Asgaran, M. Jamal Deen, Chih‐Hung Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransconductanceCMOSNoise figurePower gainLow-noise amplifierMOSFETElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringAmplifierTransistorField-effect transistorEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design and measured results of a fully integrated 5.7-GHz CMOS low-noise amplifier (LNA) is presented. To design this LNA, the parasitic input resistance of a metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) is converted to 50/spl Omega/ by a simple L-C network, hence eliminating the need for source degeneration. It is shown, by means of compact expressions, that this matching method enhances the effective transconductance of the LNA by a factor that is inversely proportional to a MOSFET's input resistance. The effect of our proposed method on the noise figure (NF) of the LNA is also discussed. With an 11.45-dB power gain and a 3.4-dB NF at 4mW of dc power, the presented LNA achieves the best overall performance when compared with the most recently published LNAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Components LettersSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207