Removing records documenting acts of violence and atrocities from the archive
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Totalitarian, dictatorial and repressive regimes may attempt to hide or destroy evidence of their abuses. A lack of evidence prevents perpetrators of crimes from being held accountable when the oppressive regime is dismantled. In the wake of these regimes, victims must come to terms with what happened to them. But what are the implications when records documenting acts of mass violence are destroyed and little evidence of the crimes is left? This research examines the importance of societies protecting documentation of the past in order to prevent collective forgetting or denial, ensuring that memory of past events remains. Through an extensive survey of the literature, many cases of the destruction of records documenting acts of mass violence were identified. In addition to presenting a mapping of nations where such acts have occurred, two are examined in detail: East Germany after the fall of the Berlin Wall and post-apartheid South Africa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it