MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2127643065 · doi:10.1002/etc.2021

Assessment of the health status of wild fish from the wheatley Harbour area of Concern, Ontario, Canada

2012· article· en· W2127643065 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ève A.M. Gilroy, Mark E. McMaster, Joanne L. Parrott, L. Mark Hewitt, Bradley J. Park, Scott Brown, James P. Sherry

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarbourFish <Actinopterygii>FisheryBiologyEcologyGeographyEnvironmental protectionZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The overall health and endocrine function of wild brown bullhead (Ameiurus nebulosus) and goldfish (Carassius auratus) from the Wheatley Harbour Area of Concern (Lake Erie, Ontario, Canada) was assessed using a suite of physiological and biochemical endpoints. Smaller gonads were detected in female brown bullhead and goldfish from Wheatley Harbour compared with Hillman Marsh (Ontario, Canada) reference fish. Female brown bullhead exhibited decreased in vitro synthesis of 17β-estradiol. Female goldfish had decreased plasma vitellogenin concentrations. Plasma testosterone and 11-ketotestosterone were significantly depressed in males of both species. Perturbations in the thyroid status were detected, but varied between sexes and species. Observed differences included lower plasma concentrations of thyroid hormones and/or elevated liver deiodinase activity. Histological evaluation of the thyroid tissue indicated that in the case of female goldfish, those perturbations stimulated the thyroid (as indicated by increased thyroid epithelial cell height) and partially depleted the thyroxine reserves, as indicated by decreased colloid and elevated thyroid activation index. Increased mixed-function oxygenase activity in brown bullhead from Wheatley Harbour was consistent with exposure to planar aromatic contaminants. A principal component analysis of selected variables showed the separation of fish by collection site. The endpoints most strongly associated with the separation were generally those exhibiting significant differences between sites. The results of the present study indicate that the health of fish populations within Wheatley Harbour warrants continued attention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.136

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry→Same topicEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology→French-language works237,207→