MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127788522 · doi:10.4141/cjps10133

Fertilisation azotée et phosphatée dans la production du bleuet nain sauvage au Québec

2011· article· fr· W2127788522 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jean Lafond, Noura Ziadi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lafond, J. et Ziadi, N. 2011. Fertilisation azotee et phosphatee dans la production du bleuet nain sauvage au Quebec. Can. J. Plant Sci. 91: 535–544. Peu d’etudes ont evalue les interactions entre l'azote (N) et le phosphore (P) dans la production du bleuet nain sauvage (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.). Ainsi, l'objectif de cette etude a ete de determiner la reponse du bleuet a la fertilisation en N et en P sous les conditions climatiques et edaphiques du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Quebec, Canada. Les traitements ont consiste en quatre doses de N (0, 30, 60 et 90 kg N ha−1) et quatre doses de P (0, 30, 60 et 90 kg P2O5 ha−1). Les rendements optimaux en fruits (5361 kg ha−1) determines selon l’equation de regression ont ete atteints avec la dose de 64 kg N ha−1 tandis que la fertilisation en P n'a eu aucun effet sur les rendements dans cette experience. La densite de tiges, le nombre de bourgeons floraux et la taille des plants ont augmente uniquement avec la fertilisation en N. Durant l'annee de vegetation, l...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFrench-language works237,207