ET <sub>A</sub> Receptor Antagonist Prevents Blood Pressure Elevation and Vascular Remodeling in Aldosterone-Infused Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increased endothelin-1 may be associated with elevation of blood pressure (BP) and promotion of vascular hypertrophy, especially in salt-sensitive hypertension. Mineralocorticoid hypertension has been associated with activation of the endothelin system. We evaluated whether in aldosterone-infused rats the selective endothelin type A receptor-antagonist BMS 182874 prevents BP elevation and vascular hypertrophy. Rats were infused with aldosterone (0.75 microg/h) subcutaneously via a mini-osmotic pump and were offered 1% NaCl in the drinking water+/-BMS 182874 (40 mg/kg in food) for 6 weeks. Systolic BP was monitored by the tail-cuff method, and vascular changes of mesenteric arteries were evaluated using a pressurized myograph. Aldosterone-infusion significantly increased BP to 151+/-7 mm Hg compared with controls (108+/-4 mm Hg, P<0.01). BMS 182874 normalized BP (117+/-4 mm Hg). Media cross-sectional area of aorta was significantly increased by aldosterone infusion (P<0.05), and BMS treatment normalized it (P<0.001). Aldosterone infusion increased media width and media-to-lumen ratio of mesenteric resistance arteries (17.6+/-0.4 microm and 7.5+/-0.4%) compared with controls (14.2+/-0.5 microm, P<0.01, and 5.9+/-0.1%, P<0.05). BMS 182874 normalized media and media-to-lumen ratio (15.1+/-0.6 microm and 5.7+/-0.1%, both P<0.01). In conclusion, the endothelin type A receptor antagonist attenuated BP elevation and prevented vascular remodeling or hypertrophy of aorta and mesenteric resistance arteries in aldosterone-infused rats. These results suggest a role for endothelin-1 in BP elevation and structural alterations of large and small vessels in aldosterone and salt-induced hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".