MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127859569 · doi:10.1109/fie.2007.4418029

An investigation of Canadian engineers: Exploring the impact of educational work experiences on career and mentor satisfaction

2007· article· en· W2127859569 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings/Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMentoring and Academic Development
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Qualitative propertyPsychologyValue (mathematics)Medical educationJob satisfactionQualitative researchCareer developmentApplied psychologySocial psychologySociologyEngineeringComputer scienceMedicineSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2005, a study was undertaken to collect quantitative and qualitative data on the career mobility of Canadian engineers in the province of Manitoba. Findings from the qualitative data drew attention to the value of prior work experience with their employers in enhancing women engineers' acquisition of soft skills. This paper examines the quantitative data on the impact of prior educational work experiences with their current employers in contributing to both male and female respondents' career and mentor satisfaction. Results show that prior work experience with current employers does not influence career satisfaction overall, but has some impact on mentor satisfaction. Gender differences in the data are further explored and implications drawn.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it