The effects of repeated allergen challenge on airway smooth muscle structural and molecular remodeling in a rat model of allergic asthma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of remodeling of airway smooth muscle (SM) by hyperplasia on airway SM contractility in vivo are poorly explored. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between allergen-induced airway SM hyperplasia and its contractile phenotype. Brown Norway rats were sensitized with ovalbumin (OVA) or saline on day 0 and then either OVA-challenged once on day 14 and killed 24 h later or OVA-challenged 3 times (on days 14, 19, and 24) and killed 2 or 7 days later. Changes in SM mass, expression of total myosin, SM myosin heavy chain fast isoform (SM-B) and myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), tracheal contractions ex vivo, and airway responsiveness to methacholine (MCh) in vivo were assessed. One day after a single OVA challenge, the number of SM cells positive for PCNA was greater than for control animals, whereas the SM mass, contractile phenotype, and tracheal contractility were unchanged. Two days after three challenges, SM mass and PCNA immunoreactive cells were increased (3- and 10-fold, respectively; P < 0.05), but airway responsiveness to MCh was unaffected. Lower expression in total myosin, SM-B, and MLCK was observed at the mRNA level (P < 0.05), and total myosin and MLCK expression were lower at the protein level (P < 0.05) after normalization for SM mass. Normalized tracheal SM force generation was also significantly lower 2 days after repeated challenges (P < 0.05). Seven days after repeated challenges, features of remodeling were restored toward control levels. Allergen-induced hyperplasia of SM cells was associated with a loss of contractile phenotype, which was offset by the increase in mass.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".