MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127877896 · doi:10.1002/ejlt.201400163

Limitation of using silver ion solid‐phase extraction for animal lipids with a low <i>trans</i> content

2014· article· en· W2127877896 on OpenAlexaff
Xabier Belaunzaran, Leire Bravo‐Lamas, John K. G. Kramer, Noelia Aldai

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Lipid Science and Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryChromatographyFractionationExtraction (chemistry)Solid phase extractionHexaneElutionAcetoneFraction (chemistry)High-performance liquid chromatographyAcetonitrileSample preparationOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Silver ion solid‐phase extraction (Ag + ‐SPE) was reported to provide effective separations compared to other Ag + techniques but at a fraction of cost and time. Ag + ‐SPE cartridges resolved fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) with different number and/or geometric configuration of double bonds. Here we attempted to determine the trans fatty acids (FA) contained in a low total trans FA sample, horse lipids; lamb was used as a control having a markedly higher total trans content. Gas chromatographic assessment of the fractions showed a good separation of the cis and trans monounsaturated FA (MUFA) fractions, but the relative high content of contaminants that coeluted with these FA impaired the identification of the latter in horse lipids. In lamb trans MUFA isomers could be identified since their abundance relative to impurities was greater. Several attempts were made to remove the contaminants from the SPE cartridges including an extensive prewash with acetone and hexane, a prewash with solvents that would elute the cis MUFA fraction, and a complete prewash of all solvents used in the fractionation, hexane, acetone, and acetonitrile. The prewash using all elution solvents removed most contaminants but subsequently impaired the separation of trans and cis MUFA fractions. The same samples were subjected to Ag + ‐HPLC fractionation that showed no impurities demonstrating that they were derived from the Ag + ‐SPE separation. The trans MUFA fraction collected from Ag + ‐HPLC allowed for the identification of the trans 16:1 and 18:1 FA in horse lipids and is recommended for samples with low trans levels. Practical applications: The commercially available silver ion solid‐phase extraction (Ag + ‐SPE) cartridges contain appreciable amounts of contaminants that can interfere with the subsequent GC‐FID elution of low levels of trans fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), especially when contaminants are leaked by the SPE tube in quantities comparable to the trans MUFA content. The contaminants could not be quantitatively removed by prewashing the cartridges with acetone and hexane. Acetonitrile removed most contaminants but altered the Ag + ‐SPE tube ability to resolve the trans and cis MUFA fractions. Ag + ‐HPLC fractionation is recommended for isolation of low levels of trans MUFA, since the washing and conditioning of the chromatographic column can be extended as needed. Ag+‐SPE cartridges are used to separate FAMEs based on number and geometric configuration of double bonds to aid in the identification of complex GC separations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Lipid Science and TechnologySame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207