MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127896394 · doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-s7-p99

Gene expression responses of black spruce (Picea mariana) to global climate change conditions

2011· article· en· W2127896394 on OpenAlexaff
Om P. Rajora, Jin‐Hong Kim, John E. Major, John W. Malcolm

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Proceedings · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to elevated CO2
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlack spruceBiologyGeneAbiotic componentGene expressionTemperate climateTaigaClimate changeStomatal conductanceTranscriptomeEcologyBotanyPhotosynthesisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global climate change conditions (elevated CO2 and atmospheric temperatures) are subjecting our forests, especially Boreal and temperate forests, to significant abiotic stresses, such as drought. This can affect health, productivity and fitness of our forests. Therefore, it is imperative to understand genomic and eco-physiological responses of forest trees to global climate change. We are addressing this aspect in black spruce (Picea mariana) - a transcontinental, ecologically and economically important tree species of the North American Boreal forest. Our objective was to determine gene expression and physiological responses and their inter-relationships in black spruce to elevated CO2, drought and co-stressed conditions. We have used NGS whole transcriptome sequencing, cDNA-AFLP and qPCR analyses to identify, annotate and characterize genes expressed differentially in response to elevated CO2, drought and combined elevated CO2 and drought conditions in black spruce using the cloned material. Photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance were measured simultaneously with tissue collection for RNA extraction. Thousands of transcripts (genes) showed differential expression (no expression, up-regulation or down-regulation) in response to elevated CO2, drought and/or their combined conditions, with over 1600 genes from several pathways showing >10-folds gene expression differences between control and treated plants. A number of genes showed 100 to 500 folds up or down regulation in response to elevated CO2, drought or their combined conditions. Responses to each treatment at the gene expression and physiological levels were correlated well among different genotypes. We will present these results which contribute significantly to our understanding of tree’s responses to global climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC ProceedingsSame topicPlant responses to elevated CO2French-language works237,207