MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127902187 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2004.1378462

Joint domain localized adaptive processing with zero forcing for multi-cell CDMA systems

2005· article· en· W2127902187 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel Wong, Raviraj Adve

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBeamformingConvergence (economics)Joint (building)Telecommunications linkSignal processingAlgorithmRate of convergenceForcing (mathematics)Code division multiple accessDigital signal processingChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An integrated beamforming (spatial processing) and multiuser detection (temporal processing) scheme is an effective approach to increase system capacity, but is also impractical due to the high associated computational costs. The authors previously proposed joint domain localized (JDL) processing which achieves significantly lower computational cost and a faster convergence rate in terms of number of training symbols. The paper justifies the choice of the transformation matrix that is the basis for the JDL algorithm. Building on JDL processing, we also introduce a new processor that combines JDL processing and zero forcing for multi-cell uplink CDMA systems. Simulations show that this approach achieves better performance and a faster convergence rate than the JDL algorithm as well as the reduced rank and iterative schemes introduced by other researchers. If restricted by short training sequences, it even outperforms the theoretically optimal processor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207