MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127909742 · doi:10.4141/p03-135

Use of N-(<i>n-butyl</i>)thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) to increase safety of seed-placed urea

2004· article· en· W2127909742 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
R. E. Karamanos, J.T. Harapiak, N.A. Flore, T. B. Stonehouse

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeedbedLoamUreaSeedingCanolaAgronomyChemistryAnimal scienceSeedlingFertilizerNitrogenSoil waterBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current guidelines for safe seedrow placement of urea N in the western Canadian prairies are based on texture, seedbed utilization and soil moisture conditions at the time of seeding. However, if N requirement is high, not all fertilizer N requirements can be met as excess urea N in the seedrow may result in plant stand reduction, delay in maturity and/or lead to yield loss. This study investigated the use of the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl)thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) as a means of increasing the safety of seedrow applied urea. Four experiments consisting of 39 trials were carried out over 3 yr to ascertain whether current guidelines could be modified through the use of NBPT. The experiments were carried out on loam to clay loam soils and barley, canola and wheat were sown with seedrow spacing and seed spread to produce seedbed utilization of approximately 10%. A safe N rate in this study was defined as the one that resulted in less than 15% reduction in the stand density of plants and no delay in maturity. There was no damage from seed-placement of N when the site received 5 to 10 mm of precipitation within 48 h of seeding. Treatment of urea with NBPT resulted in a significant improvement in stand density in two out of every three (20 of the 31) trials, where a significant reduction of stand density due to N application was observed. There were no cases where an increase in seedling damage was observed as a result of NBPT treatment of urea. Treatment of urea with NBPT resulted in an overall reduction in days to maturity with greater benefit at higher N rates of seed row placed N. However, there was a yield benefit as a result of NBPT application in only eight of the trials. Average guidelines for urea seedrow placement for barley, canola and wheat grown on medium textured soils with 10% seedbed utilization can be increased by 30, 20 and 15 kg N ha-1, respectively, when urea is treated with NBPT. Key words: Stand density, maturity, yield, barley, canola, wheat

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolismFrench-language works237,207