The dynamics of developmental system drift in the gene network underlying wing polyphenism in ants: a mathematical model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the complex interaction between genotype and phenotype is a major challenge of Evolutionary Developmental Biology. One important facet of this complex interaction has been called "Developmental System Drift" (DSD). DSD occurs when a similar phenotype, which is homologous across a group of related species, is produced by different genes or gene expression patterns in each of these related species. We constructed a mathematical model to explore the developmental and evolutionary dynamics of DSD in the gene network underlying wing polyphenism in ants. Wing polyphenism in ants is the ability of an embryo to develop into a winged queen or a wingless worker in response to an environmental cue. Although wing polyphenism is homologous across all ants, the gene network that underlies wing polyphenism has evolved. In winged ant castes, our simulations reproduced the conserved gene expression patterns observed in the network that controls wing development in holometabolous insects. In wingless ant castes, we simulated the suppression of wings by interrupting (up- or downregulating) the expression of genes in the network. Our simulations uncovered the existence of four groups of genes that have similar effects on target gene expression and growth. Although each group is comprised of genes occupying different positions in the network, their interruption produces vestigial discs that are similar in size and shape. The implications of our results for understanding the origin, evolution, and dissociation of the gene network underlying wing polyphenism in ants are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".