MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127948174 · doi:10.1109/tps.2006.874848

Progress toward optimization of phase-correcting mirrors for a multifrequency 1-MW gyrotron

2006· article· en· W2127948174 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xiaokang Yang, M. Thumm, A. Arnold, E. Borie, G. Dammertz, O. Drumm, K. Koppenburg, D. Wagner

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Plasma Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health
KeywordsGyrotronOpticsBroadbandPhase (matter)Gaussian beamUSableBeam (structure)WaveguidePhysicsMaterials scienceComputer sciencePower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the requirement of a newly designed ultra-broadband chemical vapour deposition (CVD)-diamond window for a multifrequency 1-MW short-pulse gyrotron at Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK), the existing beam-forming mirror system inside the gyrotron tube has to be modified. This paper describes the design scheme for shaping the output beams from the launching antenna waveguide into the desired fundamental Gaussian profile by using adapted phase-correcting mirrors with nonquadratic surface contour function. Simulation results show these phase-correcting mirrors can be used for broadband operation of a frequency step-tunable gyrotron, which operates in nine modes from the TE/sub 17,6/ mode at the frequency of 105 GHz to the TE/sub 23,8/ mode at 143 GHz. Further calculations predict that efficiencies of more than 94% can be obtained for converting the high-order cylindrical cavity modes into the usable fundamental Gaussian mode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Plasma ScienceSame topicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics ResearchFrench-language works237,207