The water elimination from the ethyl acetate radical cation Answers from theory to a longstanding mechanistic problem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous experimental studies of the water elimination from ionized ethyl acetate (EA-1) and its enol, CH2=C(OH)OC2H5·+ (EA-2), provide no mechanistic proposals, but note that the reaction is complex because all hydrogen atoms and both oxygen atoms participate. Loss of H2O is the predominant process observed for the metastable ions, yielding ionized methyl vinyl ketone, CH3C(=O)CH=CH2·+ (MVK), as the product ion. Metastable keto-alcohol ions CH3C(=O)CH2CH2OH·+ (HB-1) also abundantly lose H2O, yielding MVK at the thermochemical threshold. Using the CBS-QB3 model chemistry and complementary RRKM calculations, we have examined plausible mechanisms for the water elimination from metastable ions EA-1/2 and HB-1. Our calculations support the proposal that (i) ions HB-1 dissociate into MVK at the thermochemical threshold via a 1,4-H shift and a consecutive [1,2]-hydroxycarbene shift, and (ii) ions EA-1/2 undergo a three-step isomerization reaction into HB-1, which serves as the precursor for the ensuing water elimination. It is further shown that synergy between theory and experiment leads to a complex, yet transparent, mechanistic picture of the isomerization and dissociation behaviour of ionized ethyl acetate, which accounts for the labelling results.Key words: tandem mass spectrometry, CBS-QB3 model chemistry, reaction mechanism, hydroxycarbene shift.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".