GEN02-1: Hierarchical Iterative Algorithm for a Coupled Constrained OSNR Nash Game
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper develops a hierarchical iterative OSNR algorithm based on a game theory framework. A Nash game is formulated between channels with channel utility related to maximizing channel optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR). The OSNR game has coupled utilities and coupled constraints, such that total power is kept below the nonlinearity threshold. Solving directly this game requires coordination among all channels and is impractical in networks. A duality approach is used instead, based on the recent theoretical results in [16]. This method offers a natural way to hierarchically decompose the coupled Nash game into a lower-level Nash game with no coupled constraints, and a higher-level link optimization problem for pricing parameters. The lower-level Nash game is analytically tractable, and its solution can be iteratively found via an algorithm decentralized with respect to channels. The price is adjusted at the network higher-level so that channels are induced to cooperate towards satisfying the coupled total power constraint.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it