MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128021319 · doi:10.1515/bot.2003.018

Structural Analysis of Carrageenan from Farmed Varieties of Philippine Seaweed

2003· article· en· W2128021319 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jennifer T. Aguilan, Judy E. Broom, Jacqueline A. Hemmingson, Fabian M. Dayrit, M.N.E. Montaño, Maria Cristina A. Dancel, Milady R. Niñonuevo, Richard H. Furneaux

Bibliographic record

VenueBotanica Marina · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSeaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsKappaphycus alvareziiCarrageenanBotanyBiologySugarChemistryAlgaeFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kappaphycus alvarezii, Eucheuma denticulatum and, more recently, Kappaphycus sp. ‘Sacol’ variety, are the carrageenan-containing red seaweeds currently farmed in the Philippines. The Kappaphycus sp. ‘Sacol’ variety is of particular interest to the Philippine seaweed industry because of its improved resistance to ‘ice-ice’ disease and its fast growing characteristics. Here we report on the detailed chemical analysis of the carrageenan from this species. The native and alkali-modified carrageenans from Kappaphycus sp. ‘Sacol’ variety were characterized by FT-IR, 1 H and 13 C NMR spectroscopy, and constituent sugar and methylation analyses and were compared to those from K. alvarezii, K. cottonii and Eucheuma denticulatum . The three Kappaphycus species contained predominantly κ-carrageenan with low levels of ι-carrageenan, methylated carrageenan and μ-precursor residues, while Eucheuma denticulatum contained predominantly ι-carrageenan with significant amounts of ν-precursor residues. Taxonomic classification of Kappaphycus species based on morphology has proved to be difficult because of their known plasticity. Molecular analysis using the rbcL sequence revealed that the Kappaphycus sp. ‘Sacol’ variety is most likely a form of K. cottonii .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanica MarinaSame topicSeaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsFrench-language works237,207