MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128042479 · doi:10.7202/008506ar

La transposition dans la transposition

2004· article· fr· W2128042479 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bruno Blanckeman

Bibliographic record

VenueProtée · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pascal Quignard est l’un des écrivains français majeurs de la littérature immédiatement contemporaine. Les Petits Traités , son œuvre principale, peuvent être rattachés au genre du traité tel que l’âge classique le pratiqua. Plusieurs éléments attestent de cette filiation : l’importance de certains topiques comme le sentiment de la langue ou du chaos ; l’usage d’argumentaires à visée didactique ; le recours fréquent à une pensée de type axiomatique. Mais chez Quignard, le traité est l’objet d’un double processus de transposition, l’un qui tend à le fictionnaliser de façon romanesque, l’autre à l’accomplir sur un plan poétique. Chacune de ces opérations est à la fois cumulative et réversible. Le traité devient ainsi un lieu littéraire dans lequel le penseur est confronté à l’instabilité de sa propre démarche de connaissance - figure d’un lettré des temps modernes au savoir et au pouvoir soumis à l’épreuve du doute autant que de la mélancolie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProtéeSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207