Understanding Toddlers' In-Home Injuries: I. Context, Correlates, and Determinants
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multimethod strategies (i.e., questionnaires, parents' observations, injury-event recording diaries, telephone and home interviews) were used to study in-home injuries experienced by toddlers over a 3-month period. Cuts, scrapes, and puncture wounds were the most common injuries. The majority of injuries affected children's limbs, and injuries most often occurred in the morning. Boys were injured most often in rooms designated for play, and a majority of their injuries followed from misbehavior. Girls were most often injured in nonplay areas of the home, with the majority of injuries occurring during play activities. Boys experienced more frequent and severe injuries than girls, although girls reacted more than boys to their injuries. Child factors relevant to injury included: risk taking, sensation seeking, and ease of behavior management. Temperament factors did not relate to child injury. Parent factors relevant to child injury included parents' beliefs about control over their child's health, protectiveness, and beliefs about child supervision. Regression analyses revealed that both child (i.e., risk taking) and parent (i.e., protectiveness) factors were significant determinants of child injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it