Production of antifreeze glycoproteins in cultured and wild juvenile Atlantic cod (<i>Gadus morhua</i>L.) in a common laboratory environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many fishes accumulate antifreeze proteins or antifreeze glycoproteins (AFGPs) in the blood to increase their chances of survival in cold seawater. Cod (Gadus morhua L.) from colder environments have been found to produce more AFGPs than those from warmer areas, but the genetic and environmental contributions to this variation have not been determined. Populations of cultured (from the Grand Banks; Gulf of Maine) and wild (from Fortune Bay; Bonavista Bay) juvenile cod were kept in a common laboratory environment to investigate differences in AFGP production. All the populations were capable of producing AFGPs, and the AFGP levels were similar in cultured and wild cod. The results indicate that high temperatures associated with the production of cultured cod do not negatively affect the ability to produce AFGPs. In addition, young cod from as far south as the Gulf of Maine are capable of producing AFGPs at levels similar to those from the northeast coast of Newfoundland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".