MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128056863 · doi:10.1109/oceans.2008.5151952

Analysis of horizontal zigzag manoeuvring trials from the MUN Explorer AUV

2008· article· en· W2128056863 on OpenAlexaff
Manoj T. Issac, Sara Adams, Neil Bose, Christopher Williams, Ralf Bachmayer, Tristan Crees

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaCommunity Sector Council Newfoundland and LabradorInternational Submarine Engineering (Canada)Memorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZigzagUnderwaterPath (computing)Computer scienceMarine engineeringGeologySimulationEngineeringGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of full-scale zigzag manoeuvring trials were performed using a streamlined Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) - the MUN Explorer AUV during the summer of 2006. This paper presents the results and observations from the zigzag manoeuvres or the Z-tests performed in horizontal planes. Unlike the conventional method of performing a Z-test, these zigzags were performed by allowing the vehicle to follow a predefined path that was laid out in a zigzag pattern. The paper outlines briefly the method by which these tests were conducted and discusses the observations made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207