MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128068136 · doi:10.4141/s00-049

Magnetic susceptibility of a saprolite and a soil profile developed on pyroxenite at Mont-Saint-Bruno, Quebec, Canada

2001· article· en· W2128068136 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
C. R. DE KIMPE, J. Dejou, Yves Chevalier

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaproliteMaghemiteMagnetic susceptibilityGeochemistryGeologyMagnetiteIlmenitePedogenesisClay mineralsMineralogyFeldsparOpacityHematiteChemistrySoil waterWeatheringSoil scienceQuartz

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic susceptibility (χ) measurements were performed with a recording magnetic susceptivimeter on a pyroxenite and its alteration products, i.e., a saprolite and the horizons of a soil profile. Pyroxenite contains a relatively high percentage of opaque minerals that, under alteration, transformed partly into Fe oxides with a high magnetic susceptibility. In the saprolite and the soil, χ values varied according to depth in the profile, particle size, mineralogical and chemical composition. Significant correlations between χ values and Fe and Ti oxides indicated the importance of opaque minerals, magnetite, maghemite and ilmenite to the magnetic susceptibility of the alteration products of the pyroxenite. This method provided additional information on the intensity of the alteration of the rock, especially on the formation of secondary Fe oxides at the expense of the ferromagnesian minerals. Key words: Magnetic susceptibility, pyroxenite, saprolite, maghetite, maghemite, opaque minerals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207