MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128099970 · doi:10.1115/mnht2008-52274

Gas Micro-Flow Modelling Based on Regularized 13-Moment-Equations

2008· article· en· W2128099970 on OpenAlexaff
Manuel Torrilhon, Henning Struchtrup

Bibliographic record

VenueASME 2008 First International Conference on Micro/Nanoscale Heat Transfer, Parts A and B · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKnudsen numberBoundary value problemBoltzmann equationShock waveMoment (physics)PhysicsFlow (mathematics)Classical mechanicsStatistical physicsMathematicsMathematical analysisMechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We summarize our recent contributions to the development of macroscopic transport equations for gas micro-flows. A combination of the Chapman-Enskog expansion and Grad’s moment method in kinetic theory of gases yields the Regularized 13-Moment-Equations (R13 equations). These equations overcome deficiencies of Grad’s equations or Burnett models. They are asymptotically of super-Burnett order, i.e., of third order in the Knudsen number and linearly stable for all wave frequencies. In addition, a complete set of boundary conditions can derived from the accommodation boundary conditions of the Boltzmann equations. Mathematically, more boundary conditions are required and they can be derived from the R13 system itself through coherence relations. We present micro-channel and shock wave simulations to prove that R13 is a reliable and efficient continuum model for micro-flows of gases with moderate Knudsen numbers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME 2008 First International Conference on Micro/Nanoscale Heat Transfer, Parts A and BSame topicGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryFrench-language works237,207