MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128120815 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2009.5090290

Research and development of fast field tester for characteristics of solar array

2009· article· en· W2128120815 on OpenAlexaff
Jianhui Su, Liuchen Chang, Peng Kai, Ming Ding

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemSchematicField (mathematics)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceSolar energySizingElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I-V characteristic of a solar array is very important for the design and long-term performance evaluation of a photovoltaic (PV) generation system. Manufacturers provide only I-V characteristic of (PV) modules at standard conditions in Lab. However, a PV generation system will operate at a widely variable environment conditions. Besides, the different combinations of PV Models in series and parallel may give rise to some energy loss because of nonuniform characteristic of individual PV modules. Therefore, accurate performance evaluation of a PV station faces great challenges. This brings about great needs for fast field testers for I-V characteristic of the solar array. This paper presents capacitor charging schematic for fast field testing of I-V characteristic of solar arrays. A prototype based DSP TMS320F2806 is designed and manufactured. The prototype is featured in automatic pre-estimated measurement scale by the theory model of I-V curve, and digital filtering of sampling data. The field experiment results show that the testing system operates stately, and with high measurement accuracy and speed. A complete testing procedure only takes about 10s, and the measured I-V characteristics of solar arrays can be displayed on LCD directly in the form of a curve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.197

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207