Entre responsabilisation et individualisation : les évolutions de l’engagement associatif
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’engagement associatif a évolué au cours des vingt dernières années, témoignant d’un mode d’être dans la société marqué par un renforcement de l’individualisation. Plus actif mais moins militant, il est centré sur l’épanouissement personnel, valorise la sociabilité amicale et s’inscrit essentiellement dans des associations sportives et de loisirs. Cette évolution ne joue guère en faveur du rôle, traditionnellement attribué aux associations, de responsabilisation et d’ouverture sur la société globale. Désormais, la vie associative s’articule moins à des normes et à des valeurs qu’à la mise en oeuvre d’une sociabilité et à la valorisation d’une subjectivité. Cette évolution de l’engagement associatif entraîne de nouvelles modalités d’inscription des individus dans l’espace public.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".