MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128125655 · doi:10.1109/tbc.2006.880324

Performance of Cyclic Delay Diversity in DAB/DMB

2006· article· en· W2128125655 on OpenAlexaff
Zhihong Hong, L. Zhang, Louis Thibault

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterleavingDigital audio broadcastingComputer scienceDiversity schemeOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingDigital multimedia broadcastingElectronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)Diversity gainMIMOFrequency selectivityTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyclic delay diversity (CDD) is a simple and elegant technique to exploit transmit diversity in a MIMO-OFDM system by artificially increasing the frequency-selectivity of the equivalent channel. In this paper, we study the application of CDD in digital audio broadcasting (DAB), which is well motivated by the mismatch analysis between the channel inherent diversity and the capability of the DAB channel coding and interleaving. Simulation of DAB with CDD in rural area and typical urban area is carried out; the results demonstrate the advantage of CDD in creating a more uniform coverage area compared to the system without CDD. We further devise a lower bound which allows justification of tradeoff between the design parameters and the performance improvement

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on BroadcastingSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207