Performance Analysis of Subcarrier Allocation in Two Dimensionally Spread OFCDM Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing (OFCDM) has recently been introduced as a candidate for 4th generation wireless systems. This signalling scheme utilizes code spreading in the time and frequency domains simultaneously to improve frequency diversity and minimize MAI simultaneously. As a result, it is capable of outperforming multicarrier CDMA systems that employ one-dimensional spreading. In this paper, a novel adaptive subcarrier allocation algorithm is developed for OFCDM to improve the overall BER performance for all spreading configurations. This algorithm assigns users to subcarrier groups that provide favorable fading characteristics, while simultaneously reducing the amount of interference caused to other users. The proposed algorithm is shown to provide a performance improvement ranging from 1.5 dB with 2times16 spreading, to 7 dB with 16times2 spreading. The algorithm is also shown to maintain or improve the BER floor for each OFCDM spreading configuration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it