MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128155858 · doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.2002.199.01.02

Seismic heterogeneity and anisotropy in the Western Superior Province, Canada: insights into the evolution of an Archaean craton

2002· article· en· W2128155858 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. M. Kendall, S. Sol, C. J. Thomson, Don White, I. Asudeh, Christopher Snell, F. H. Sutherland

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcheanCratonGeologyAnisotropySeismologyPaleontologyEarth scienceTectonicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Superior Province, which forms the nucleus of North America, is the largest preserved Archaean crustal block in the world and may have originated as the result of a widespread crustal accretion event ( c. 2.7 Ga) manifested in Archaean cratons worldwide. An understanding of the accretionary evolution of this craton is the objective of the continuing Lithoprobe transect in the Western Superior Province, Canada. The geophysical components of the transect include seismic reflection and refraction, magnetotellurics and teleseismic experiments. The Teleseismic Western Superior Transect (TWiST) was designed to explore the structural and physical properties of the subcrustal lithosphere and their implications for proposed accretionary models. A north-south-trending array of 17 broadband three-component seismometers was deployed between May and November 1997. Surface-wave analyses, SKS-splitting studies and travel-time tomography show variations in the velocity structure and anisotropy between the southern end of the transect, a region affected by Keweenawan rifting, and the northern part, which lies in the Proterozoic Trans-Hudson shear zone. Surface waves reveal evidence for a thin high-velocity layer, 5–20 km thick, beneath a 37–43 km thick crust and above c. 250 km of high-velocity continental root. This thin layer is also visible in wide-angle refraction data from the southern end of the line and may be evidence of underplating during terrane accretion. Discrepancies in the Love and Rayleigh waves and surface-wave particle motions show evidence for an anisotropic mantle. SKS analysis shows large amounts (up to 2 s) of shear-wave splitting with a roughly eastwest trend in the fast-shear-wave polarization direction for most stations. This conforms with crustal deformation trends. Stations in the younger Trans-Hudson orogen show much less splitting. Detailed analysis at a permanent station in the Western Superior shows evidence for two layers of anisotropy. A thinner upper layer is aligned with the surface geology, indicating crust-mantle coupling during craton formation, whereas a thicker lower layer is aligned with the direction of absolute plate motion. Tomographic results show a featureless mantle beneath the Sachigo proto-craton and more heterogeneity towards the south end of the line. A steeply dipping slab-like feature in the lithosphere correlates with wide-angle refraction and deep-reflection seismic profiles. A similar high-velocity feature continues well into the transition zone, but its origin remains to be understood. Towards the southern end of the line there is a deep-seated low-velocity anomaly, which may be associated with Keweenawan plume activity. As a whole, the seismic results show many features that support ideas of subduction-related accretion of a thick stable Archaean tectosphere. There are, however, interesting details that are to date unique to the Western Superior Province. These include thicker than normal Archaean crust, a slab-like velocity anomaly in the mantle transition zone, and large SKS splitting in the Archaean Superior Province but little splitting in the surrounding Trans-Hudson Proterozoic shear zone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207