MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128173524 · doi:10.2118/117579-pa

Miscible Interaction Between Matrix and Fracture: A Visualization and Simulation Study

2010· article· en· W2128173524 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Vahapcan Er, Tayfun Babadagli

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMG Reservoir Simulation Foundation
KeywordsFracture (geology)Materials scienceViscous fingeringPorous mediumMatrix (chemical analysis)MiscibilityViscosityEnhanced oil recoverySaturation (graph theory)SolventPetroleum engineeringComposite materialPorosityMechanicsChemistryPolymerGeologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary CO2 injection has been applied in naturally fractured reservoirs (NFRs) for the purpose of enhanced oil recovery (i.e., the Wey-burn and Midale fields, Canada; the Wasson and Slaughter fields, USA; and the Bati Raman field, Turkey). The matrix part of these types of reservoirs could potentially be a good storage medium as well. Understanding the matrix/fracture interaction during this process and the dynamics of the flow in this dual-porosity system requires visual analyses. We mimicked fully miscible CO2 injection in NFRs using 2D models with a single fracture and oil (solute)/hydrocarbon solvent pairs. The focus was on the visual pore-scale analysis of miscibility interaction, breakthrough of solvent through fracture, transfer between matrix and fracture, and the dynamics of miscible displacement inside the matrix. First, matrix/fracture interaction was studied intensively using 2D glass-bead models experimentally. The model was prepared using acrylic sheets and glass beads saturated with oil as a porous medium while a narrow gap of 1-mm size containing filter paper served as a fracture. The first contact miscible solvent (pentane) was injected into the fracture, and the flow distribution was monitored using an image-acquisition and -processing system. The produced solvent and solute were continuously analyzed for compositional study. The effects of several parameters, such as flow rate, viscosity ratio (oil/solvent), and gravity, were studied. Next, the process was modeled numerically using a commercial compositional simulator, and the saturation distribution in the matrix was matched to experimental data. The key parameters in the matching process were the effective diffusion coefficients and the longitudinal and the transverse dispersivities. The diffusion coefficients were specified for each fluid, and dispersivities were assigned into gridblocks separately for the fracture and the matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & EngineeringSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207