THE pp CONJECTURE FOR SPACES OF ORDERINGS OF RATIONAL CONICS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
First counterexamples are given to a basic question raised in [10]. The paper considers the space of orderings (X,G) of the function field of a real irreducible conic [Formula: see text] over the field ℚ of rational numbers. It is shown that the pp conjecture fails to hold for such a space of orderings when [Formula: see text] has no rational points. In this case, it is shown that the pp conjecture "almost holds" in the sense that, if a pp formula holds on each finite subspace of (X,G), then it holds on each proper subspace of (X,G). For pp formulas which are product-free and 1-related, the pp conjecture is known to be true, at least if the stability index is finite [11]. The counterexamples constructed here are the simplest sort of pp formulas which are not product-free and 1-related.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it