Protein and gene expression patterns of endo-β-mannanase following germination of rice
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cv. Taichung 65, a japonica subspecies, was used to characterize the isoform, protein and gene expression patterns of endo-β-mannanase during and after seed germination. Activity assays and isoform analyses of whole grains or seed parts (scutellum, aleurone layer and starchy endosperm) revealed that seeds began to express endo-β-mannanase activity at 48 h from the start of imbibition at 25°C, after the completion of germination of most seeds. Three isoforms of endo-β-mannanase (pI 8.86, pI 8.92 and pI 8.98) were detected in the aleurone layer and starchy endosperm, but only two (pI 8.86 and pI 8.92) were present in the scutellum. The endo-β-mannanase in the starchy endosperm was mainly from the aleurone layer. Western blot analysis, using a tomato anti-endo-β-mannanase antibody, indicated that an endo-β-mannanase protein was present in an inactive form in dry grains. The amount of this protein decreased in the scutellum, but increased in the aleurone layer during and after germination. Thus, the increase in endo-β-mannanase activity in rice grains may be due to the activation of extant proteins and/or the de novo synthesis of the enzyme. Northern blot analysis showed that four putative rice endo-β-mannanase genes ( OsMAN1 , OsMAN2 , OsMAN6 and OsMANP ) were expressed in germinating and germinated rice grains. However, OsMANP was not expressed in the scutellum. The amount of OsMAN6 mRNA decreased after the completion of germination and paralleled the decline in endo-β-mannanase protein. In the aleurone layer, the increase of OsMAN2 , OsMAN6 and OsMANP mRNA was prior to the increase of endo-β-mannanase protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it