MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128250426 · doi:10.1109/naps.2008.5307377

Composite generation and transmission system reliability evaluation incorporating two wind energy facilities considering wind speed correlation

2008· article· en· W2128250426 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Reliability and Maintenance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind speedWind powerMonte Carlo methodReliability (semiconductor)Transmission systemReliability engineeringTransmission (telecommunications)Wind engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceMarine engineeringSimulationMeteorologyEngineeringStructural engineeringStatisticsElectrical engineeringMathematicsTelecommunicationsPower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper illustrates the effects on the load point and system reliability indices of a composite generation and transmission system of adding wind energy facilities with different degrees of wind speed correlation. The studies were conducted on the two test systems using a state sampling Monte Carlo approach. The analyses show the impacts of adding wind generating capacity at various locations in the two test systems and the effects on the load point and system indices of varying the wind penetration and the wind speed correlation levels. The studies presented illustrate the importance of considering wind speed correlation in the reliability assessment of composite generation and transmission systems containing large scale wind energy facilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Reliability and MaintenanceFrench-language works237,207