MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128264300 · doi:10.1002/chem.200901024

Theoretical Calculations on the Tetramethyldisilene Rearrangement: A New Approach to an Old Mechanistic Problem

2009· article· en· W2128264300 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mrinmoy Nag, Peter P. Gaspar

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of ChemistryMinistère de l'Économie, de la Science et de l'Innovation - QuébecNational Science Foundation
KeywordsChemistryProduct (mathematics)Kinetic energyKinetic controlComputational chemistryThermodynamicsReaction mechanismMechanism (biology)Organic chemistryPhysicsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Roark and Peddle first observed that, when not trapped, Me(2)Si=SiMe(2) underwent a series of rearrangements to give two major isomeric products: 1,1-dimethyl-1,3-disilacyclobutane and 1,3-dimethyl-1,3-disilacyclobutane. The widely accepted mechanism for this rearrangement was proposed by Barton and co-workers. However, little is known about the thermodynamic or kinetic properties of this reaction, because the relevant data are limited to the product ratios of the two isomers. Our calculations predict that the product ratio is driven by kinetic control rather than thermodynamic control. We also show that new DFT functionals, such as MPW1K and M052X, produce thermochemical results comparable with CCSD(T) calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compoundsFrench-language works237,207