MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128267434 · doi:10.1504/ijbet.2012.049366

Multistage preictal seizure analysis using Hidden Markov Model

2012· article· en· W2128267434 on OpenAlexaff
Alan Chiu, Hareesh Gadi, Daniel W. Moller, Taufik A. Valiante, Danielle M. Andrade

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHidden Markov modelComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)EpilepsyIctalElectroencephalographyArtificial intelligencePopulationSpeech recognitionEpileptic seizureSensitivity (control systems)Markov modelGaussianMarkov chainMachine learningNeurosciencePsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epileptic seizures may be described as the population entrainment of low complexity activities. Multistage seizure detection implemented using hidden Markov model (HMM) was proposed for the analysis of intracranial EEG recordings of epilepsy patients. The number of hidden states and the number of Gaussian clusters of the HMM were obtained using an unsupervised method. Multiple dynamic stages had been found leading to ictal activity. High sensitivity and specificity can be achieved based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (with area > 0.85). Spatial generalisation features study suggested that HMM framework is independent of the subject and the testing recording location.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Biomedical Engineering and TechnologySame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207