Psychosocial factors as predictors of functional status at 1 year in patients with left ventricular dysfunction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic heart failure patients often experience significant functional impairments. A better understanding of the biopsychosocial correlates of functional status may lead to interventions that improve quality of life in this population. Social isolation, mood disturbance, low socioeconomic status, and non-White ethnicity were evaluated as possible correlates of impaired functional status in 2,992 U.S. patients with left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs) </= 35%. Even after controlling for age and clinical characteristics, all of the psychosocial variables examined were significant predictors of risk for experiencing severe limitations in intermediate and social activities of daily living at 1 year, with adjusted odds ratios in the 1.5-2.0 range. The ability of psychosocial characteristics to predict future functional status was also independent of baseline functional status, comorbid medical conditions, and deterioration in heart failure signs and symptoms over the intervening year. These results suggest that psychosocial factors influence patient functional status even in the later phases of cardiac disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it