Pediatric Myocarditis: Emergency Department Clinical Findings and Diagnostic Evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The goal was to determine, in children with myocarditis, the frequency of various presenting symptoms and the sensitivity of clinical and laboratory investigations routinely available in the emergency department. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients < 18 years of age who were diagnosed as having myocarditis at our institution between May 2000 and May 2006 and who initially presented to an emergency department. Patients were categorized as having definite myocarditis (positive endomyocardial biopsy results) or probable myocarditis (diagnosis assigned by a pediatric cardiologist on the basis of history, physical examination, and investigation results in the absence of an endomyocardial biopsy or in the presence of negative biopsy results). All patients were assigned a predominant category of symptoms at presentation on the basis of criteria defined a priori. RESULTS: There were 16 cases of definite myocarditis and 15 cases of probable myocarditis. The age distribution was nonnormal, with peaks among children < or = 3 years and > or = 16 years of age. Of 14 patients who were seen by a physician before being diagnosed with myocarditis, 57% were originally diagnosed as having pneumonia or asthma. Thirty-two percent of patients presented with predominantly respiratory symptoms, 29% had cardiac symptoms, and 6% had gastrointestinal symptoms. Although evidence of cardiac dysfunction was frequently present in the form of respiratory distress, only a minority of children had evidence of hepatomegaly or abnormal cardiac examination results. The sensitivities of electrocardiograms and chest radiographs as screening tests were 93% and 55%, respectively. Among laboratory tests studied, aspartate aminotransferase measurement was the most sensitive (sensitivity: 85%). CONCLUSIONS: Children with myocarditis present with symptoms that can be mistaken for other types of illnesses; respiratory presentations were most common. When clinical suspicion of myocarditis exists, chest radiography alone is an insufficient screening test. All children should undergo electrocardiography. Aspartate aminotransferase testing may be a useful adjunctive investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".