Density functional theory predictions for small radicals containing boron and aluminium: broken symmetry problems and solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selected exchange-correlation functionals were employed to study certain radicals for which unrestricted (U) Hartree–Fock and post-Hartree–Fock methods showed spatial symmetry breakings. For AlO, BO2 and BS2 all functionals produced symmetry adapted solutions and predicted geometries and vibrational spectra in good accord with experiment. The USVWN and UB3LYP solutions for the D∞h O–Al–O structure break spin symmetry. Mixing of these spin-unrestricted Kohn–Sham orbitals yielded stable solutions with reasonable geometries and energetics but with large errors for the vibrational spectra. Only UBHandHLYP results in a broken spatial symmetry solution and yields an anomalous vibrational spectrum. The UBLYP solution does not show a tendency to instability and predicts a Dinfin;h O–Al–O species with a 2Πg electronic state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".