MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128405445 · doi:10.2528/pierb11110508

MAGNETIC FORCE CALCULATION BETWEEN CIRCULAR COILS OF RECTANGULAR CROSS SECTION WITH PARALLEL AXES FOR SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET

2012· article· en· W2128405445 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress In Electromagnetics Research B · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetCross section (physics)Section (typography)SuperconductivitySuperconducting CoilsPhysicsSuperconducting magnetCondensed matter physicsNuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract—The electromagnetic force between two misaligned coils (coils with parallel axes) with uniform current density distribution and rectangular cross section based on the derived semi-analytical expressions was presented. Using the semi-analytical expressions for magnetic force between filamentary misalignment circular coils we calculate the propulsive and the transverse magnetic force. In order to verify the validity of the expressions, we use the filament method with Grover’s formula to calculate the magnetic force for two coils with parallel axes. The results obtained by two methods are in a very good agreement. In this paper, the derivation of the semianalytical expressions and the calculation results of the magnetic force are introduced. 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it