Dynamic partitioning of the cache hierarchy in shared data centers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the imperative need to reduce the management costs of large data centers, operators multiplex several concurrent database applications on a server farm connected to shared network attached storage. Determining and enforcing per-application resource quotas in the resulting cache hierarchy, on the fly, poses a complex resource allocation problem spanning the database server and the storage server tiers. This problem is further complicated by the need to provide strict Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees to hosted applications. In this paper, we design and implement a novel coordinated partitioning technique of the database buffer pool and storage cache between applications for any given cache replacement policy and per-application access pattern. We use statistical regression to dynamically determine the mapping between cache quota settings and the resulting per-application QoS. A resource controller embedded within the database engine actuates the partitioning of the two-level cache, converging towards the configuration with maximum application utility, expressed as the service provider revenue in that configuration, based on a set of latency sample points. Our experimental evaluation, using the MySQL database engine, a server farm with consolidated storage, and two e-commerce benchmarks, shows the effectiveness of our technique in enforcing application QoS, as well as maximizing the revenue of the service provider in shared server farms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".