MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128418848 · doi:10.14778/1453856.1453926

Dynamic partitioning of the cache hierarchy in shared data centers

2008· article· en· W2128418848 on OpenAlexaff
Gokul Soundararajan, Jin Chen, Mohamed A. Sharaf, Cristiana Amza

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the VLDB Endowment · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheDatabaseCache algorithmsCache invalidationQuality of serviceComputer networkOperating systemDistributed computingCPU cache

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the imperative need to reduce the management costs of large data centers, operators multiplex several concurrent database applications on a server farm connected to shared network attached storage. Determining and enforcing per-application resource quotas in the resulting cache hierarchy, on the fly, poses a complex resource allocation problem spanning the database server and the storage server tiers. This problem is further complicated by the need to provide strict Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees to hosted applications. In this paper, we design and implement a novel coordinated partitioning technique of the database buffer pool and storage cache between applications for any given cache replacement policy and per-application access pattern. We use statistical regression to dynamically determine the mapping between cache quota settings and the resulting per-application QoS. A resource controller embedded within the database engine actuates the partitioning of the two-level cache, converging towards the configuration with maximum application utility, expressed as the service provider revenue in that configuration, based on a set of latency sample points. Our experimental evaluation, using the MySQL database engine, a server farm with consolidated storage, and two e-commerce benchmarks, shows the effectiveness of our technique in enforcing application QoS, as well as maximizing the revenue of the service provider in shared server farms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the VLDB EndowmentSame topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207