MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128433403 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2005.1556964

A novel bistable microelectromechanical mechanism utilizing socket joints

2006· article· en· W2128433403 on OpenAlexafffund
N. Jahedi, Ian G. Foulds, M. Parameswaran

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBistabilityMicroelectromechanical systemsMechanism (biology)Power (physics)Computer scienceBlock (permutation group theory)State (computer science)Energy consumptionMechanical engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a novel bistable microelectromechanical mechanism implementation that utilizes socket joints. The energy storage characteristics of this mechanism offer two distinct stable states with power only required to shift from one state to the other. The mechanism described is a novel implementation of a toggle-type bistable microelectromechanical system (MEMS). Bistable mechanisms are a basic mechanical building block and find use in micro electrical and optical switches, as well as any mechanisms that require two stable positions and low power consumption. The design consists of several socket joints and springs, which create an energy barrier between stable states. When changing from one state to the other the springs reach a maximum compression at the toggle point, after which the stored energy in the springs is released bringing the mechanism into the second stable state. The design was fabricated using MUMPs technology. The devices were tested in our lab and they displayed the predicted functionality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207