MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128446766 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2006.883103

A Low-Phase Noise, Anti-Harmonic Programmable DLL Frequency Multiplier With Period Error Compensation for Spur Reduction

2006· article· en· W2128446766 on OpenAlexaff
Qingjin Du, Jingcheng Zhuang, Tad Kwasniewski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II Analog and Digital Signal Processing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsdBcFrequency multiplierPhase noiseJitterCMOSVoltage-controlled oscillatorMultiplier (economics)Frequency offsetPhase-locked loopElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringPhysicsComputer scienceEngineeringVoltageOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A low phase noise, delay-locked loop-based programmable frequency multiplier, with the multiplication ratio from 13 to 20 and output frequency range from 900 MHz to 2.9 GHz, is reported in this brief. A new switching control scheme is employed in the circuit to enable the capability of locking to frequencies either above or below the start-up frequency without initialization. To reduce the spurious output power level, a low-bandwidth auxiliary loop [period error compensation loop (PECL)] is employed to compensate for the output period error caused by the phase realignment errors. This frequency multiplier is implemented in TSMC 0.18-mum CMOS technology and measured with a synthesized frequency source. A significant reduction of the output spurs from -23 to -46.5 dB at 1.216 GHz is achieved by enabling the PECL. The measured cycle-to-cycle timing jitter at 2.16 GHz is 1.6 ps (rms) and 12.9 ps (pk-pk), and the phase noise is -110 dBc/Hz at 100-kHz offset with a power consumption of 19.8 mW at a 1.8-V power supply

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II Analog and Digital Signal ProcessingSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207